Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Qwen
Qwen
vs
Stepfun-ai

Qwen3 4B vs Step 3.5 Flash

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Qwen3 4B wins:

  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Faster response time

Step 3.5 Flash wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
Price Advantage
Qwen3 4B
Benchmark Advantage
Step 3.5 Flash
Context Window
Step 3.5 Flash
Speed
Qwen3 4B

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureQwen3 4BStep 3.5 Flash
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyQwen3 4BStep 3.5 Flash
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorQwenStepfun-ai
ReleasedApr 2025Jan 2026

Qwen3 4B Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Step 3.5 Flash Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Step 3.5 Flash has cheaper input pricing at $0.10/M tokens. Qwen3 4B has cheaper output pricing at $0.20/M tokens.
Qwen3 4B has a 40,960 token context window, while Step 3.5 Flash has a 256,000 token context window.
Qwen3 4B does not support vision. Step 3.5 Flash does not support vision.