Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Qwen
Qwen
vs
Qwen
Qwen

Qwen3 8B vs Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Qwen3 8B wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Faster response time
  • Has reasoning mode

Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto) wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
Price Advantage
Qwen3 8B
Benchmark Advantage
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)
Context Window
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)
Speed
Qwen3 8B

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureQwen3 8BQwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyQwen3 8BQwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorQwenQwen
ReleasedApr 2025Jul 2025

Qwen3 8B Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto) Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Qwen3 8B has cheaper input pricing at $0.05/M tokens. Qwen3 8B has cheaper output pricing at $0.20/M tokens.
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto) scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 24.6, compared to Qwen3 8B's score of 7.1.
Qwen3 8B has a 40,960 token context window, while Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto) has a 262,144 token context window.
Qwen3 8B does not support vision. Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto) does not support vision.