Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Qwen
Qwen
vs
Xiaomi

Qwen3 Coder 480B Instruct BF16 vs MiMo v2 Pro

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Qwen3 Coder 480B Instruct BF16 wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Supports tool calls

MiMo v2 Pro wins:

  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
Price Advantage
Qwen3 Coder 480B Instruct BF16
Benchmark Advantage
MiMo v2 Pro
Context Window
Qwen3 Coder 480B Instruct BF16
Speed
MiMo v2 Pro

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureQwen3 Coder 480B Instruct BF16MiMo v2 Pro
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyQwen3 Coder 480B Instruct BF16MiMo v2 Pro
LicenseOpen SourceProprietary
AuthorQwenXiaomi

Qwen3 Coder 480B Instruct BF16 Modalities

Input
Output

MiMo v2 Pro Modalities

Input
Output

Frequently Asked Questions

Qwen3 Coder 480B Instruct BF16 has cheaper input pricing at $0.90/M tokens. Qwen3 Coder 480B Instruct BF16 has cheaper output pricing at $0.90/M tokens.