Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Qwen
Qwen
vs
Tngtech

Qwen3.5 397B A17B vs DeepSeek R1T Chimera

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Qwen3.5 397B A17B wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Supports vision

DeepSeek R1T Chimera wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Has reasoning mode
Price Advantage
DeepSeek R1T Chimera
Benchmark Advantage
Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Context Window
Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Speed
Qwen3.5 397B A17B

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureQwen3.5 397B A17BDeepSeek R1T Chimera
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyQwen3.5 397B A17BDeepSeek R1T Chimera
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorQwenTngtech
ReleasedFeb 2026Unknown

Qwen3.5 397B A17B Modalities

Input
textimagevideo
Output
text

DeepSeek R1T Chimera Modalities

Input
Output

Frequently Asked Questions

DeepSeek R1T Chimera has cheaper input pricing at $0.00/M tokens. DeepSeek R1T Chimera has cheaper output pricing at $0.00/M tokens.
Qwen3.5 397B A17B has a 262,144 token context window, while DeepSeek R1T Chimera has a 163,840 token context window.
Qwen3.5 397B A17B supports vision. DeepSeek R1T Chimera does not support vision.