Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Qwen
Qwen
vs
?

Qwen3.5 9B vs GLM 4.1V 9B Thinking

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Qwen3.5 9B wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding

GLM 4.1V 9B Thinking wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Supports vision
  • Has reasoning mode
Price Advantage
GLM 4.1V 9B Thinking
Benchmark Advantage
Qwen3.5 9B
Context Window
Qwen3.5 9B
Speed
Qwen3.5 9B

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureQwen3.5 9BGLM 4.1V 9B Thinking
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyQwen3.5 9BGLM 4.1V 9B Thinking
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorQwen
ReleasedMar 2026Unknown

Qwen3.5 9B Modalities

Input
textimagevideo
Output
text

GLM 4.1V 9B Thinking Modalities

Input
Output

Frequently Asked Questions

GLM 4.1V 9B Thinking has cheaper input pricing at $0.03/M tokens. GLM 4.1V 9B Thinking has cheaper output pricing at $0.11/M tokens.
Qwen3.5 9B has a 262,144 token context window, while GLM 4.1V 9B Thinking has a 32,768 token context window.
Qwen3.5 9B does not support vision. GLM 4.1V 9B Thinking supports vision.