Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Allenai
vs
Allenai

Olmo 2 32B Instruct vs Olmo 3.1 32B Think

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

Key Takeaways

Olmo 2 32B Instruct wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window

Olmo 3.1 32B Think wins:

  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Has reasoning mode
Price Advantage
Olmo 2 32B Instruct
Benchmark Advantage
Olmo 3.1 32B Think
Context Window
Olmo 2 32B Instruct
Speed
Olmo 3.1 32B Think

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureOlmo 2 32B InstructOlmo 3.1 32B Think
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyOlmo 2 32B InstructOlmo 3.1 32B Think
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorAllenaiAllenai
ReleasedMar 2025Dec 2025

Olmo 2 32B Instruct Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Olmo 3.1 32B Think Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Olmo 2 32B Instruct with:

Compare Olmo 3.1 32B Think with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Olmo 2 32B Instruct has cheaper input pricing at $0.05/M tokens. Olmo 2 32B Instruct has cheaper output pricing at $0.20/M tokens.
Olmo 3.1 32B Think scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 9.8, compared to Olmo 2 32B Instruct's score of 2.7.
Olmo 2 32B Instruct has a 128,000 token context window, while Olmo 3.1 32B Think has a 65,536 token context window.
Olmo 2 32B Instruct does not support vision. Olmo 3.1 32B Think does not support vision.