Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Allenai
vs
OpenAI
OpenAI

Olmo 3.1 32B Think vs GPT-5.3 Codex

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

Key Takeaways

Olmo 3.1 32B Think wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Faster response time
  • Better at math

GPT-5.3 Codex wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Supports vision
  • Supports tool calls
Price Advantage
Olmo 3.1 32B Think
Benchmark Advantage
GPT-5.3 Codex
Context Window
GPT-5.3 Codex
Speed
Olmo 3.1 32B Think

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureOlmo 3.1 32B ThinkGPT-5.3 Codex
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyOlmo 3.1 32B ThinkGPT-5.3 Codex
LicenseOpen SourceProprietary
AuthorAllenaiOpenAI
ReleasedDec 2025Feb 2026

Olmo 3.1 32B Think Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

GPT-5.3 Codex Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Olmo 3.1 32B Think with:

Compare GPT-5.3 Codex with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Olmo 3.1 32B Think has cheaper input pricing at $0.15/M tokens. Olmo 3.1 32B Think has cheaper output pricing at $0.50/M tokens.
GPT-5.3 Codex scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 53.1, compared to Olmo 3.1 32B Think's score of 9.8.
Olmo 3.1 32B Think has a 65,536 token context window, while GPT-5.3 Codex has a 400,000 token context window.
Olmo 3.1 32B Think does not support vision. GPT-5.3 Codex supports vision.