Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
A
Allenai
vs
A
Allenai

Olmo 3.1 32B Instruct vs Olmo 3.1 32B Think

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Olmo 3.1 32B Instruct wins:

  • Faster response time
  • Supports tool calls

Olmo 3.1 32B Think wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Has reasoning mode
Price Advantage
Olmo 3.1 32B Think
Benchmark Advantage
Olmo 3.1 32B Think
Context Window
Olmo 3.1 32B Think
Speed
Olmo 3.1 32B Instruct

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureOlmo 3.1 32B InstructOlmo 3.1 32B Think
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyOlmo 3.1 32B InstructOlmo 3.1 32B Think
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorAllenaiAllenai
ReleasedJan 2026Dec 2025

Olmo 3.1 32B Instruct Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Olmo 3.1 32B Think Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

See all model comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Olmo 3.1 32B Think has cheaper input pricing at $0.15/M tokens. Olmo 3.1 32B Think has cheaper output pricing at $0.50/M tokens.
Olmo 3.1 32B Think scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 9.8, compared to Olmo 3.1 32B Instruct's score of 5.6.
Olmo 3.1 32B Instruct has a 65,536 token context window, while Olmo 3.1 32B Think has a 65,536 token context window.
Olmo 3.1 32B Instruct does not support vision. Olmo 3.1 32B Think does not support vision.

Built by @aellman

Archive
Follow us:
Advertise | Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026 68 Ventures, LLC. All rights reserved.