Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Baidu
Baidu
vs
Baidu
Baidu

ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B Thinking vs ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Best Coding Model Leaderboard Find the top LLM for coding by benchmarks and community votes

114 out of our 298 tracked models have had a price change in February.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B Thinking wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Has reasoning mode

ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B wins:

  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
Price Advantage
ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B Thinking
Benchmark Advantage
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B
Context Window
ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B Thinking
Speed
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricERNIE 4.5 21B A3B ThinkingERNIE 4.5 300B A47BWinner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.07$0.28 ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B Thinking
Output (per 1M tokens)$0.28$1.10 ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B Thinking
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B Thinking is 75% cheaper overall.

ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B Thinking Providers

Novita $0.07 (Cheapest)

ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B Providers

SiliconFlow $0.28 (Cheapest)
Novita $0.28 (Cheapest)

Benchmark Comparison

7
Benchmarks Compared
0
ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B Thinking Wins
0
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkERNIE 4.5 21B A3B ThinkingERNIE 4.5 300B A47BWinner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
-14.9-
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
-14.5-
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
-41.3-
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
-77.6-
GPQA
Graduate-level science
-81.1-
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
-46.7-
AIME
Competition math
-49.3-
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B Thinking
131,072
tokens
Max output: 65,536 tokens
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B
123,000
tokens
Max output: 12,000 tokens
ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B Thinking has a 6% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricERNIE 4.5 21B A3B ThinkingERNIE 4.5 300B A47BWinner
Tokens/secondN/A20.6 tok/s
Time to First TokenN/A1.94s

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureERNIE 4.5 21B A3B ThinkingERNIE 4.5 300B A47B
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyERNIE 4.5 21B A3B ThinkingERNIE 4.5 300B A47B
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorBaiduBaidu
ReleasedOct 2025Jun 2025

ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B Thinking Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B Thinking with:

Compare ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B with:

Frequently Asked Questions

ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B Thinking has cheaper input pricing at $0.07/M tokens. ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B Thinking has cheaper output pricing at $0.28/M tokens.
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 14.5, compared to ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B Thinking's score of N/A.
ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B Thinking has a 131,072 token context window, while ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B has a 123,000 token context window.
ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B Thinking does not support vision. ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B does not support vision.