Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Baidu
Baidu
vs
Qwen
Qwen

ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B Thinking vs Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B Thinking wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens

Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 wins:

  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
Price Advantage
ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B Thinking
Benchmark Advantage
Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
Context Window
Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
Speed
Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureERNIE 4.5 21B A3B ThinkingQwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyERNIE 4.5 21B A3B ThinkingQwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorBaiduQwen
ReleasedOct 2025Jul 2025

ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B Thinking Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B Thinking has cheaper input pricing at $0.07/M tokens. Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 has cheaper output pricing at $0.10/M tokens.
ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B Thinking has a 131,072 token context window, while Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 has a 262,144 token context window.
ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B Thinking does not support vision. Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 does not support vision.