Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Bytedance-seed
Bytedance-seed
vs
Bytedance-seed
Bytedance-seed

Seed 1.6 Flash vs Seed OSS 36B Instruct

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

Key Takeaways

Seed 1.6 Flash wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Supports vision
  • Has reasoning mode

Seed OSS 36B Instruct wins:

  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
Price Advantage
Seed 1.6 Flash
Benchmark Advantage
Seed OSS 36B Instruct
Context Window
Seed 1.6 Flash
Speed
Seed OSS 36B Instruct

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureSeed 1.6 FlashSeed OSS 36B Instruct
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertySeed 1.6 FlashSeed OSS 36B Instruct
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
AuthorBytedance-seedBytedance-seed
ReleasedDec 2025Unknown

Seed 1.6 Flash Modalities

Input
imagetextvideo
Output
text

Seed OSS 36B Instruct Modalities

Input
Output

Related Comparisons

Compare Seed 1.6 Flash with:

Compare Seed OSS 36B Instruct with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Seed 1.6 Flash has cheaper input pricing at $0.07/M tokens. Seed 1.6 Flash has cheaper output pricing at $0.30/M tokens.
Seed OSS 36B Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 16.7, compared to Seed 1.6 Flash's score of N/A.
Seed 1.6 Flash has a 262,144 token context window, while Seed OSS 36B Instruct has a 262,000 token context window.
Seed 1.6 Flash supports vision. Seed OSS 36B Instruct does not support vision.