Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Bytedance-seed
Bytedance-seed
vs
Qwen
Qwen

Seed 1.6 Flash vs Qwen2.5 7B Instruct

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Seed 1.6 Flash wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Supports vision
  • Has reasoning mode

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
Price Advantage
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Benchmark Advantage
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Context Window
Seed 1.6 Flash
Speed
N/A

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureSeed 1.6 FlashQwen2.5 7B Instruct
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertySeed 1.6 FlashQwen2.5 7B Instruct
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorBytedance-seedQwen
ReleasedDec 2025Oct 2024

Seed 1.6 Flash Modalities

Input
imagetextvideo
Output
text

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct has cheaper input pricing at $0.04/M tokens. Qwen2.5 7B Instruct has cheaper output pricing at $0.10/M tokens.
Seed 1.6 Flash has a 262,144 token context window, while Qwen2.5 7B Instruct has a 32,768 token context window.
Seed 1.6 Flash supports vision. Qwen2.5 7B Instruct does not support vision.