Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Bytedance-seed
Bytedance-seed
vs
Xiaomi

Seed 1.6 Flash vs MiMo-V2-Flash

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Seed 1.6 Flash wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Supports vision

MiMo-V2-Flash wins:

  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
Price Advantage
Seed 1.6 Flash
Benchmark Advantage
MiMo-V2-Flash
Context Window
MiMo-V2-Flash
Speed
MiMo-V2-Flash

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureSeed 1.6 FlashMiMo-V2-Flash
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertySeed 1.6 FlashMiMo-V2-Flash
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorBytedance-seedXiaomi
ReleasedDec 2025Dec 2025

Seed 1.6 Flash Modalities

Input
imagetextvideo
Output
text

MiMo-V2-Flash Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Seed 1.6 Flash has cheaper input pricing at $0.07/M tokens. MiMo-V2-Flash has cheaper output pricing at $0.29/M tokens.
Seed 1.6 Flash has a 262,144 token context window, while MiMo-V2-Flash has a 262,144 token context window.
Seed 1.6 Flash supports vision. MiMo-V2-Flash does not support vision.