Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Google
Google
vs
Google
Google

Gemini 2.0 Flash Experimental vs Gemini 3 Pro Preview

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

107 out of our 480 tracked models have had a price change in March.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

Gemini 2.0 Flash Experimental wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens

Gemini 3 Pro Preview wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Supports vision
  • Has reasoning mode
Price Advantage
Gemini 2.0 Flash Experimental
Benchmark Advantage
Gemini 3 Pro Preview
Context Window
Gemini 3 Pro Preview
Speed
Gemini 3 Pro Preview

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricGemini 2.0 Flash ExperimentalGemini 3 Pro PreviewWinner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.10$2.00 Gemini 2.0 Flash Experimental
Output (per 1M tokens)$0.40$12.00 Gemini 2.0 Flash Experimental
Cache Read (per 1M)N/A$0.20 Gemini 3 Pro Preview
Cache Write (per 1M)N/A$0.38 Gemini 3 Pro Preview
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, Gemini 2.0 Flash Experimental is 96% cheaper overall.

Gemini 2.0 Flash Experimental Providers

No provider data available

Gemini 3 Pro Preview Providers

No provider data available

Benchmark Comparison

8
Benchmarks Compared
0
Gemini 2.0 Flash Experimental Wins
4
Gemini 3 Pro Preview Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash ExperimentalGemini 3 Pro PreviewWinner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
16.848.4
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
-46.5-
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
-95.7-
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
78.289.8
GPQA
Graduate-level science
63.690.8
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
21.091.7
Aider
Real-world code editing
69.9--
AIME
Competition math
30.0--
Gemini 3 Pro Preview significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
Gemini 2.0 Flash Experimental
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

Gemini 2.0 Flash Experimental
N/A
tokens
Gemini 3 Pro Preview
1,048,576
tokens

Speed Performance

MetricGemini 2.0 Flash ExperimentalGemini 3 Pro PreviewWinner
Tokens/second0.0 tok/s113.2 tok/s
Time to First Token0.00s13.82s
Gemini 3 Pro Preview responds Infinity% faster on average.

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureGemini 2.0 Flash ExperimentalGemini 3 Pro Preview
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyGemini 2.0 Flash ExperimentalGemini 3 Pro Preview
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
AuthorGoogleGoogle
ReleasedUnknownNov 2025

Gemini 2.0 Flash Experimental Modalities

Input
Output

Gemini 3 Pro Preview Modalities

Input
textimagefileaudiovideo
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Gemini 2.0 Flash Experimental with:

Compare Gemini 3 Pro Preview with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Gemini 2.0 Flash Experimental has cheaper input pricing at $0.10/M tokens. Gemini 2.0 Flash Experimental has cheaper output pricing at $0.40/M tokens.
Gemini 3 Pro Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 46.5, compared to Gemini 2.0 Flash Experimental's score of N/A.
Gemini 2.0 Flash Experimental has a unknown token context window, while Gemini 3 Pro Preview has a 1,048,576 token context window.
Gemini 2.0 Flash Experimental does not support vision. Gemini 3 Pro Preview supports vision.
Advertise with us