Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Google
Google
vs
Google
Google

Gemini 2.0 Flash Experimental vs Gemma 2 27B

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Gemini 2.0 Flash Experimental wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time

Gemma 2 27B wins:

  • Higher intelligence benchmark
Price Advantage
Gemini 2.0 Flash Experimental
Benchmark Advantage
Gemma 2 27B
Context Window
Gemini 2.0 Flash Experimental
Speed
Gemini 2.0 Flash Experimental

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureGemini 2.0 Flash ExperimentalGemma 2 27B
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyGemini 2.0 Flash ExperimentalGemma 2 27B
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorGoogleGoogle
ReleasedUnknownJul 2024

Gemini 2.0 Flash Experimental Modalities

Input
textimageaudiovideo
Output
textimage

Gemma 2 27B Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Gemini 2.0 Flash Experimental has cheaper input pricing at $0.10/M tokens. Gemini 2.0 Flash Experimental has cheaper output pricing at $0.40/M tokens.
Gemini 2.0 Flash Experimental has a 1,048,576 token context window, while Gemma 2 27B has a 8,192 token context window.
Gemini 2.0 Flash Experimental supports vision. Gemma 2 27B supports vision.