Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Google
Google
vs
Google
Google

Gemini 2.0 Flash Experimental vs Gemma 2 27B

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

107 out of our 480 tracked models have had a price change in March.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

Gemini 2.0 Flash Experimental wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Faster response time
  • Supports tool calls

Gemma 2 27B wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
Price Advantage
Gemini 2.0 Flash Experimental
Benchmark Advantage
Gemma 2 27B
Context Window
Gemma 2 27B
Speed
Gemini 2.0 Flash Experimental

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricGemini 2.0 Flash ExperimentalGemma 2 27BWinner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.10$0.65 Gemini 2.0 Flash Experimental
Output (per 1M tokens)$0.40$0.65 Gemini 2.0 Flash Experimental
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, Gemini 2.0 Flash Experimental is 73% cheaper overall.

Gemini 2.0 Flash Experimental Providers

No provider data available

Gemma 2 27B Providers

No provider data available

Benchmark Comparison

7
Benchmarks Compared
3
Gemini 2.0 Flash Experimental Wins
1
Gemma 2 27B Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash ExperimentalGemma 2 27BWinner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
16.836.2
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
78.238.4
GPQA
Graduate-level science
63.616.7
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
21.0--
Aider
Real-world code editing
69.936.1
AIME
Competition math
30.0--
BBH
Big-Bench Hard
-49.3-
Gemini 2.0 Flash Experimental wins 3 out of 7 benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
Gemini 2.0 Flash Experimental
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

Gemini 2.0 Flash Experimental
N/A
tokens
Gemma 2 27B
8,192
tokens

Speed Performance

MetricGemini 2.0 Flash ExperimentalGemma 2 27BWinner
Tokens/second0.0 tok/sN/A
Time to First Token0.00sN/A

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureGemini 2.0 Flash ExperimentalGemma 2 27B
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyGemini 2.0 Flash ExperimentalGemma 2 27B
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorGoogleGoogle
ReleasedUnknownJul 2024

Gemini 2.0 Flash Experimental Modalities

Input
Output

Gemma 2 27B Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Gemini 2.0 Flash Experimental with:

Compare Gemma 2 27B with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Gemini 2.0 Flash Experimental has cheaper input pricing at $0.10/M tokens. Gemini 2.0 Flash Experimental has cheaper output pricing at $0.40/M tokens.
Gemini 2.0 Flash Experimental scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of N/A, compared to Gemma 2 27B's score of N/A.
Gemini 2.0 Flash Experimental has a unknown token context window, while Gemma 2 27B has a 8,192 token context window.
Gemini 2.0 Flash Experimental does not support vision. Gemma 2 27B does not support vision.
Advertise with us