Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Mistral AI
Mistral AI
vs
Qwen
Qwen

Mistral Small 3.2 24B vs Qwen3 Coder Next

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Mistral Small 3.2 24B wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Better at math
  • Supports vision

Qwen3 Coder Next wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
Price Advantage
Mistral Small 3.2 24B
Benchmark Advantage
Qwen3 Coder Next
Context Window
Qwen3 Coder Next
Speed
Qwen3 Coder Next

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureMistral Small 3.2 24BQwen3 Coder Next
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyMistral Small 3.2 24BQwen3 Coder Next
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorMistral AIQwen
ReleasedJun 2025Feb 2026

Mistral Small 3.2 24B Modalities

Input
imagetext
Output
text

Qwen3 Coder Next Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Mistral Small 3.2 24B has cheaper input pricing at $0.07/M tokens. Mistral Small 3.2 24B has cheaper output pricing at $0.20/M tokens.
Qwen3 Coder Next scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 22.9, compared to Mistral Small 3.2 24B's score of 13.3.
Mistral Small 3.2 24B has a 131,072 token context window, while Qwen3 Coder Next has a 262,144 token context window.
Mistral Small 3.2 24B supports vision. Qwen3 Coder Next does not support vision.