Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
OpenAI
OpenAI
vs
Qwen
Qwen

GPT-5.3 Codex vs Qwen3 Coder Next

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

119 out of our 496 tracked models have had a price change in March.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

GPT-5.3 Codex wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Supports vision
  • Has reasoning mode

Qwen3 Coder Next wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Faster response time
Price Advantage
Qwen3 Coder Next
Benchmark Advantage
GPT-5.3 Codex
Context Window
GPT-5.3 Codex
Speed
Qwen3 Coder Next

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureGPT-5.3 CodexQwen3 Coder Next
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyGPT-5.3 CodexQwen3 Coder Next
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorOpenAIQwen
ReleasedFeb 2026Feb 2026

GPT-5.3 Codex Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

Qwen3 Coder Next Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare GPT-5.3 Codex with:

Compare Qwen3 Coder Next with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Qwen3 Coder Next has cheaper input pricing at $0.12/M tokens. Qwen3 Coder Next has cheaper output pricing at $0.75/M tokens.
GPT-5.3 Codex scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 53.1, compared to Qwen3 Coder Next's score of 22.9.
GPT-5.3 Codex has a 400,000 token context window, while Qwen3 Coder Next has a 262,144 token context window.
GPT-5.3 Codex supports vision. Qwen3 Coder Next does not support vision.