Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Moonshotai
Moonshotai
vs
Qwen
Qwen

Kimi K2 0711 vs Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Kimi K2 0711 wins:

  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding

Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Better at math
Price Advantage
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
Benchmark Advantage
Kimi K2 0711
Context Window
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
Speed
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureKimi K2 0711Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyKimi K2 0711Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorMoonshotaiQwen
ReleasedJul 2025Sep 2025

Kimi K2 0711 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct has cheaper input pricing at $0.09/M tokens. Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct has cheaper output pricing at $0.78/M tokens.
Kimi K2 0711 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 22.1, compared to Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct's score of 15.3.
Kimi K2 0711 has a 131,000 token context window, while Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct has a 262,144 token context window.
Kimi K2 0711 does not support vision. Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct does not support vision.