Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Nvidia
Nvidia
vs
Qwen
Qwen

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Faster response time

Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 wins:

  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
Price Advantage
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
Benchmark Advantage
Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
Context Window
Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
Speed
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BQwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BQwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorNvidiaQwen
ReleasedDec 2025Jul 2025

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B has cheaper input pricing at $0.05/M tokens. Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 has cheaper output pricing at $0.10/M tokens.
Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 22.1, compared to Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B's score of 15.8.
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B has a 262,144 token context window, while Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 has a 262,144 token context window.
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B does not support vision. Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 does not support vision.