Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Nvidia
Nvidia
vs
Qwen
Qwen

Nemotron Nano 12B 2 VL vs Qwen2.5 7B Instruct

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Nemotron Nano 12B 2 VL wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Supports vision
  • Has reasoning mode

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
Price Advantage
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Benchmark Advantage
Nemotron Nano 12B 2 VL
Context Window
Nemotron Nano 12B 2 VL
Speed
Nemotron Nano 12B 2 VL

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureNemotron Nano 12B 2 VLQwen2.5 7B Instruct
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyNemotron Nano 12B 2 VLQwen2.5 7B Instruct
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorNvidiaQwen
ReleasedOct 2025Oct 2024

Nemotron Nano 12B 2 VL Modalities

Input
imagetextvideo
Output
text

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct has cheaper input pricing at $0.04/M tokens. Qwen2.5 7B Instruct has cheaper output pricing at $0.10/M tokens.
Nemotron Nano 12B 2 VL has a 131,072 token context window, while Qwen2.5 7B Instruct has a 32,768 token context window.
Nemotron Nano 12B 2 VL supports vision. Qwen2.5 7B Instruct does not support vision.