Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Nvidia
Nvidia
vs
Stepfun-ai

Nemotron Nano 12B 2 VL vs Step 3.5 Flash

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Nemotron Nano 12B 2 VL wins:

  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Faster response time
  • Better at math
  • Supports vision

Step 3.5 Flash wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
Price Advantage
Nemotron Nano 12B 2 VL
Benchmark Advantage
Step 3.5 Flash
Context Window
Step 3.5 Flash
Speed
Nemotron Nano 12B 2 VL

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureNemotron Nano 12B 2 VLStep 3.5 Flash
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyNemotron Nano 12B 2 VLStep 3.5 Flash
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorNvidiaStepfun-ai
ReleasedOct 2025Jan 2026

Nemotron Nano 12B 2 VL Modalities

Input
imagetextvideo
Output
text

Step 3.5 Flash Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Step 3.5 Flash has cheaper input pricing at $0.10/M tokens. Nemotron Nano 12B 2 VL has cheaper output pricing at $0.20/M tokens.
Step 3.5 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 31.6, compared to Nemotron Nano 12B 2 VL's score of 5.9.
Nemotron Nano 12B 2 VL has a 131,072 token context window, while Step 3.5 Flash has a 256,000 token context window.
Nemotron Nano 12B 2 VL supports vision. Step 3.5 Flash does not support vision.