Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Nvidia
Nvidia
vs
Xiaomi

Nemotron Nano 12B 2 VL vs MiMo-V2-Flash

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Nemotron Nano 12B 2 VL wins:

  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Faster response time
  • Supports vision

MiMo-V2-Flash wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
Price Advantage
Nemotron Nano 12B 2 VL
Benchmark Advantage
MiMo-V2-Flash
Context Window
MiMo-V2-Flash
Speed
Nemotron Nano 12B 2 VL

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureNemotron Nano 12B 2 VLMiMo-V2-Flash
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyNemotron Nano 12B 2 VLMiMo-V2-Flash
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorNvidiaXiaomi
ReleasedOct 2025Dec 2025

Nemotron Nano 12B 2 VL Modalities

Input
imagetextvideo
Output
text

MiMo-V2-Flash Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

MiMo-V2-Flash has cheaper input pricing at $0.09/M tokens. Nemotron Nano 12B 2 VL has cheaper output pricing at $0.20/M tokens.
MiMo-V2-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 25.8, compared to Nemotron Nano 12B 2 VL's score of 5.9.
Nemotron Nano 12B 2 VL has a 131,072 token context window, while MiMo-V2-Flash has a 262,144 token context window.
Nemotron Nano 12B 2 VL supports vision. MiMo-V2-Flash does not support vision.