Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Nvidia
Nvidia
vs
Qwen
Qwen

Nemotron-3 Super 120B A12B vs Qwen3 Coder Next

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

119 out of our 496 tracked models have had a price change in March.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

Nemotron-3 Super 120B A12B wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding

Qwen3 Coder Next wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Supports tool calls
Price Advantage
Nemotron-3 Super 120B A12B
Benchmark Advantage
Nemotron-3 Super 120B A12B
Context Window
Qwen3 Coder Next
Speed
Nemotron-3 Super 120B A12B

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureNemotron-3 Super 120B A12BQwen3 Coder Next
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyNemotron-3 Super 120B A12BQwen3 Coder Next
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorNvidiaQwen
ReleasedUnknownFeb 2026

Nemotron-3 Super 120B A12B Modalities

Input
Output

Qwen3 Coder Next Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Nemotron-3 Super 120B A12B with:

Compare Qwen3 Coder Next with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Nemotron-3 Super 120B A12B has cheaper input pricing at $0.10/M tokens. Nemotron-3 Super 120B A12B has cheaper output pricing at $0.50/M tokens.
Nemotron-3 Super 120B A12B scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 31.2, compared to Qwen3 Coder Next's score of 22.9.
Nemotron-3 Super 120B A12B has a unknown token context window, while Qwen3 Coder Next has a 262,144 token context window.
Nemotron-3 Super 120B A12B does not support vision. Qwen3 Coder Next does not support vision.