Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
OpenAI
OpenAI
vs
Qwen
Qwen

GPT-4 vs Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

92 out of our 301 tracked models have had a price change in March.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

GPT-4 wins:

  • No clear advantages in compared metrics

Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto) wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
Price Advantage
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)
Benchmark Advantage
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)
Context Window
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)
Speed
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricGPT-4Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)Winner
Input (per 1M tokens)$30.00$0.22 Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)
Output (per 1M tokens)$60.00$1.00 Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)
Cache Read (per 1M)N/A$0.02 Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto) is 99% cheaper overall.

GPT-4 Providers

OpenAI $30.00 (Cheapest)
Azure $30.00 (Cheapest)

Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto) Providers

Google $0.22 (Cheapest)
SiliconFlow $0.25
Novita $0.30
Vercel $0.40
Nebius $0.40

Benchmark Comparison

8
Benchmarks Compared
0
GPT-4 Wins
2
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto) Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkGPT-4Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)Winner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
12.824.8
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
13.124.6
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
-39.3-
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
-78.8-
GPQA
Graduate-level science
-61.8-
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
-58.5-
Aider
Real-world code editing
67.7--
AIME
Competition math
-47.7-
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto) significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

GPT-4
8,191
tokens
Max output: 4,096 tokens
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)
262,144
tokens
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto) has a 97% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricGPT-4Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)Winner
Tokens/second35.1 tok/s47.5 tok/s
Time to First Token0.68s1.64s
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto) responds 35% faster on average.

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureGPT-4Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyGPT-4Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorOpenAIQwen
ReleasedMay 2023Jul 2025

GPT-4 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto) Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare GPT-4 with:

Compare Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto) with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto) has cheaper input pricing at $0.22/M tokens. Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto) has cheaper output pricing at $1.00/M tokens.
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto) scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 24.6, compared to GPT-4's score of 13.1.
GPT-4 has a 8,191 token context window, while Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto) has a 262,144 token context window.
GPT-4 does not support vision. Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto) does not support vision.