Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
OpenAI
OpenAI
vs
Qwen
Qwen

GPT-4o vs Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

92 out of our 301 tracked models have had a price change in March.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

GPT-4o wins:

  • Faster response time
  • Supports vision

Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto) wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
Price Advantage
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)
Benchmark Advantage
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)
Context Window
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)
Speed
GPT-4o

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricGPT-4oQwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)Winner
Input (per 1M tokens)$2.50$0.22 Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)
Output (per 1M tokens)$10.00$1.00 Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)
Cache Read (per 1M)$1.25$0.02 Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto) is 91% cheaper overall.

GPT-4o Providers

OpenAI $2.50 (Cheapest)
Vercel $2.50 (Cheapest)
Azure $2.50 (Cheapest)

Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto) Providers

Google $0.22 (Cheapest)
SiliconFlow $0.25
Novita $0.30
Vercel $0.40
Nebius $0.40

Benchmark Comparison

8
Benchmarks Compared
0
GPT-4o Wins
5
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto) Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkGPT-4oQwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)Winner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
18.624.8
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
16.624.6
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
-39.3-
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
-78.8-
GPQA
Graduate-level science
52.161.8
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
31.758.5
Aider
Real-world code editing
74.4--
AIME
Competition math
11.747.7
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto) significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

GPT-4o
128,000
tokens
Max output: 16,384 tokens
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)
262,144
tokens
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto) has a 51% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricGPT-4oQwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)Winner
Tokens/second131.8 tok/s47.5 tok/s
Time to First Token0.51s1.64s
GPT-4o responds 178% faster on average.

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureGPT-4oQwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyGPT-4oQwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorOpenAIQwen
ReleasedMay 2024Jul 2025

GPT-4o Modalities

Input
textimagefile
Output
text

Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto) Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare GPT-4o with:

Compare Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto) with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto) has cheaper input pricing at $0.22/M tokens. Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto) has cheaper output pricing at $1.00/M tokens.
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto) scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 24.6, compared to GPT-4o's score of 16.6.
GPT-4o has a 128,000 token context window, while Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto) has a 262,144 token context window.
GPT-4o supports vision. Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto) does not support vision.