Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
OpenAI
OpenAI
vs
Qwen
Qwen

GPT-4o vs Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Sponsor Price Per Token Reach 5000+ developers comparing LLM APIs

116 out of our 296 tracked models have had a price change in January.

Make informed model choices with updates on pricing, new releases, and tools with our weekly newsletter.

Key Takeaways

GPT-4o wins:

  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Supports vision

Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto) wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
Price Advantage
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)
Benchmark Advantage
GPT-4o
Context Window
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)
Speed
GPT-4o

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricGPT-4oQwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)Winner
Input (per 1M tokens)$2.50$0.22 Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)
Output (per 1M tokens)$10.00$0.95 Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)
Cache Read (per 1M)$1250000.00N/A GPT-4o
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto) is 91% cheaper overall.

GPT-4o Providers

OpenAI $2.50 (Cheapest)
Vercel $2.50 (Cheapest)
OpenRouter $2.50 (Cheapest)
Azure $2.50 (Cheapest)

Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto) Providers

Chutes $0.22 (Cheapest)
OpenRouter $0.22 (Cheapest)
Google $0.22 (Cheapest)
SiliconFlow $0.25
DeepInfra $0.28

Benchmark Comparison

5
Benchmarks Compared
0
GPT-4o Wins
0
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto) Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkGPT-4oQwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)Winner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
15.6--
GPQA
Graduate-level science
52.1--
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
31.7--
Aider
Real-world code editing
74.4--
AIME
Competition math
11.7--
Both models show comparable benchmark performance.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

GPT-4o
128,000
tokens
Max output: 16,384 tokens
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)
262,144
tokens
Max output: 262,144 tokens
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto) has a 51% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricGPT-4oQwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)Winner
Tokens/second77.3 tok/sN/A
Time to First Token0.51sN/A

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureGPT-4oQwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyGPT-4oQwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorOpenAIQwen
ReleasedMay 2024Jul 2025

GPT-4o Modalities

Input
textimagefile
Output
text

Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto) Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare GPT-4o with:

Compare Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto) with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto) has cheaper input pricing at $0.22/M tokens. Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto) has cheaper output pricing at $0.95/M tokens.
GPT-4o scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of N/A, compared to Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)'s score of N/A.
GPT-4o has a 128,000 token context window, while Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto) has a 262,144 token context window.
GPT-4o supports vision. Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto) does not support vision.