Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Qwen
Qwen
vs
Qwen
Qwen

Qwen3 Coder Next vs Qwen3.5 397B A17B

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

119 out of our 496 tracked models have had a price change in March.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

Qwen3 Coder Next wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Faster response time

Qwen3.5 397B A17B wins:

  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Supports vision
Price Advantage
Qwen3 Coder Next
Benchmark Advantage
Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Context Window
Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Speed
Qwen3 Coder Next

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureQwen3 Coder NextQwen3.5 397B A17B
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyQwen3 Coder NextQwen3.5 397B A17B
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorQwenQwen
ReleasedFeb 2026Feb 2026

Qwen3 Coder Next Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Qwen3.5 397B A17B Modalities

Input
textimagevideo
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Qwen3 Coder Next with:

Compare Qwen3.5 397B A17B with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Qwen3 Coder Next has cheaper input pricing at $0.12/M tokens. Qwen3 Coder Next has cheaper output pricing at $0.75/M tokens.
Qwen3.5 397B A17B scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 37.4, compared to Qwen3 Coder Next's score of 22.9.
Qwen3 Coder Next has a 262,144 token context window, while Qwen3.5 397B A17B has a 262,144 token context window.
Qwen3 Coder Next does not support vision. Qwen3.5 397B A17B supports vision.