Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Xiaomi
vs
Z-ai

MiMo v2 Pro vs GLM-4.7-Flash

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

MiMo v2 Pro wins:

  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding

GLM-4.7-Flash wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Supports vision
  • Has reasoning mode
  • Supports tool calls
Price Advantage
GLM-4.7-Flash
Benchmark Advantage
MiMo v2 Pro
Context Window
GLM-4.7-Flash
Speed
GLM-4.7-Flash

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureMiMo v2 ProGLM-4.7-Flash
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyMiMo v2 ProGLM-4.7-Flash
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorXiaomiZ-ai
ReleasedUnknownJan 2026

MiMo v2 Pro Modalities

Input
Output

GLM-4.7-Flash Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

GLM-4.7-Flash has cheaper input pricing at $0.06/M tokens. GLM-4.7-Flash has cheaper output pricing at $0.40/M tokens.
MiMo v2 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 41.4, compared to GLM-4.7-Flash's score of 11.0.