Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Minimax
Minimax
vs
Z-ai

MiniMax M2.7 vs GLM-4.7-Flash

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

MiniMax M2.7 wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding

GLM-4.7-Flash wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Faster response time
  • Supports vision
  • Has reasoning mode
Price Advantage
GLM-4.7-Flash
Benchmark Advantage
MiniMax M2.7
Context Window
MiniMax M2.7
Speed
GLM-4.7-Flash

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureMiniMax M2.7GLM-4.7-Flash
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyMiniMax M2.7GLM-4.7-Flash
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorMinimaxZ-ai
ReleasedMar 2026Jan 2026

MiniMax M2.7 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

GLM-4.7-Flash Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

GLM-4.7-Flash has cheaper input pricing at $0.06/M tokens. GLM-4.7-Flash has cheaper output pricing at $0.40/M tokens.
MiniMax M2.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 41.9, compared to GLM-4.7-Flash's score of 11.0.
MiniMax M2.7 has a 204,800 token context window, while GLM-4.7-Flash has a 202,752 token context window.