Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
OpenAI
OpenAI
vs
Z
Z-ai

GPT-5.3 Codex vs GLM-4.7-Flash

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

GPT-5.3 Codex wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding

GLM-4.7-Flash wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Faster response time
Price Advantage
GLM-4.7-Flash
Benchmark Advantage
GPT-5.3 Codex
Context Window
GPT-5.3 Codex
Speed
GLM-4.7-Flash

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureGPT-5.3 CodexGLM-4.7-Flash
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyGPT-5.3 CodexGLM-4.7-Flash
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorOpenAIZ-ai
ReleasedFeb 2026Jan 2026

GPT-5.3 Codex Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

GLM-4.7-Flash Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

See all model comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

GLM-4.7-Flash has cheaper input pricing at $0.06/M tokens. GLM-4.7-Flash has cheaper output pricing at $0.40/M tokens.
GPT-5.3 Codex scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 53.1, compared to GLM-4.7-Flash's score of 11.0.
GPT-5.3 Codex has a 400,000 token context window, while GLM-4.7-Flash has a 202,752 token context window.
GPT-5.3 Codex supports vision. GLM-4.7-Flash supports vision.

Built by @aellman

Archive
Follow us:
Advertise | Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026 68 Ventures, LLC. All rights reserved.