Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Nvidia
Nvidia
vs
Qwen
Qwen

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Qwen3 Coder Next

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Better at math
  • Has reasoning mode

Qwen3 Coder Next wins:

  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
Price Advantage
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
Benchmark Advantage
Qwen3 Coder Next
Context Window
Qwen3 Coder Next
Speed
Qwen3 Coder Next

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BQwen3 Coder Next
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BQwen3 Coder Next
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorNvidiaQwen
ReleasedDec 2025Feb 2026

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Qwen3 Coder Next Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B has cheaper input pricing at $0.05/M tokens. Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B has cheaper output pricing at $0.20/M tokens.
Qwen3 Coder Next scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 22.9, compared to Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B's score of 15.8.
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B has a 262,144 token context window, while Qwen3 Coder Next has a 262,144 token context window.
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B does not support vision. Qwen3 Coder Next does not support vision.