Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Qwen
Qwen
vs
Xiaomi

Qwen3 Coder Next vs MiMo-V2-Flash

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

OpenClaw

Best LLMs for OpenClaw Vote for which model works best with OpenClaw

101 out of our 303 tracked models have had a price change in February.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

Qwen3 Coder Next wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens

MiMo-V2-Flash wins:

  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
Price Advantage
Qwen3 Coder Next
Benchmark Advantage
MiMo-V2-Flash
Context Window
MiMo-V2-Flash
Speed
MiMo-V2-Flash

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricQwen3 Coder NextMiMo-V2-FlashWinner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.07$0.09 Qwen3 Coder Next
Output (per 1M tokens)$0.30$0.29 MiMo-V2-Flash
Cache Read (per 1M)$35000.00$45000.00 Qwen3 Coder Next
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, Qwen3 Coder Next is 9% cheaper overall.

Qwen3 Coder Next Providers

Chutes $0.07 (Cheapest)
Parasail $0.15
Novita $0.20
Together $0.50

MiMo-V2-Flash Providers

Chutes $0.09 (Cheapest)
AtlasCloud $0.10
Xiaomi $0.10
Novita $0.10

Benchmark Comparison

6
Benchmarks Compared
1
Qwen3 Coder Next Wins
2
MiMo-V2-Flash Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkQwen3 Coder NextMiMo-V2-FlashWinner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
28.130.6
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
22.925.8
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
-67.7-
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
-74.4-
GPQA
Graduate-level science
73.765.6
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
-40.2-
MiMo-V2-Flash shows stronger mathematical reasoning abilities.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

Qwen3 Coder Next
262,144
tokens
Max output: 65,536 tokens
MiMo-V2-Flash
262,144
tokens

Speed Performance

MetricQwen3 Coder NextMiMo-V2-FlashWinner
Tokens/second103.6 tok/s145.1 tok/s
Time to First Token0.68s1.19s
MiMo-V2-Flash responds 40% faster on average.

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureQwen3 Coder NextMiMo-V2-Flash
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyQwen3 Coder NextMiMo-V2-Flash
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorQwenXiaomi
ReleasedFeb 2026Dec 2025

Qwen3 Coder Next Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

MiMo-V2-Flash Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Qwen3 Coder Next with:

Compare MiMo-V2-Flash with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Qwen3 Coder Next has cheaper input pricing at $0.07/M tokens. MiMo-V2-Flash has cheaper output pricing at $0.29/M tokens.
MiMo-V2-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 25.8, compared to Qwen3 Coder Next's score of 22.9.
Qwen3 Coder Next has a 262,144 token context window, while MiMo-V2-Flash has a 262,144 token context window.
Qwen3 Coder Next does not support vision. MiMo-V2-Flash does not support vision.