Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Z
Z-ai
vs
Z
Z-ai

GLM-4.7-Flash vs GLM 5

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

GLM-4.7-Flash wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Faster response time
  • Supports vision

GLM 5 wins:

  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
Price Advantage
GLM-4.7-Flash
Benchmark Advantage
GLM 5
Context Window
GLM 5
Speed
GLM-4.7-Flash

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureGLM-4.7-FlashGLM 5
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyGLM-4.7-FlashGLM 5
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorZ-aiZ-ai
ReleasedJan 2026Feb 2026

GLM-4.7-Flash Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

GLM 5 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

See all model comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

GLM-4.7-Flash has cheaper input pricing at $0.06/M tokens. GLM-4.7-Flash has cheaper output pricing at $0.40/M tokens.
GLM 5 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 39.0, compared to GLM-4.7-Flash's score of 11.0.
GLM-4.7-Flash has a 202,752 token context window, while GLM 5 has a 202,752 token context window.
GLM-4.7-Flash supports vision. GLM 5 does not support vision.

Built by @aellman

Archive
Follow us:
Advertise | Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026 68 Ventures, LLC. All rights reserved.