Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Nvidia
Nvidia
vs
Qwen
Qwen

Nemotron Nano 12B 2 VL vs Qwen3 Coder Next

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Nemotron Nano 12B 2 VL wins:

  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Better at math
  • Supports vision
  • Has reasoning mode

Qwen3 Coder Next wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
Price Advantage
Nemotron Nano 12B 2 VL
Benchmark Advantage
Qwen3 Coder Next
Context Window
Qwen3 Coder Next
Speed
Qwen3 Coder Next

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureNemotron Nano 12B 2 VLQwen3 Coder Next
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyNemotron Nano 12B 2 VLQwen3 Coder Next
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorNvidiaQwen
ReleasedOct 2025Feb 2026

Nemotron Nano 12B 2 VL Modalities

Input
imagetextvideo
Output
text

Qwen3 Coder Next Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Qwen3 Coder Next has cheaper input pricing at $0.12/M tokens. Nemotron Nano 12B 2 VL has cheaper output pricing at $0.20/M tokens.
Qwen3 Coder Next scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 22.9, compared to Nemotron Nano 12B 2 VL's score of 5.9.
Nemotron Nano 12B 2 VL has a 131,072 token context window, while Qwen3 Coder Next has a 262,144 token context window.
Nemotron Nano 12B 2 VL supports vision. Qwen3 Coder Next does not support vision.