Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Qwen
Qwen
vs
Z
Z-ai

Qwen3.5 9B vs GLM-4.7-Flash

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Qwen3.5 9B wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding

GLM-4.7-Flash wins:

  • Supports vision
  • Has reasoning mode
Price Advantage
Qwen3.5 9B
Benchmark Advantage
Qwen3.5 9B
Context Window
Qwen3.5 9B
Speed
Qwen3.5 9B

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureQwen3.5 9BGLM-4.7-Flash
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyQwen3.5 9BGLM-4.7-Flash
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorQwenZ-ai
ReleasedMar 2026Jan 2026

Qwen3.5 9B Modalities

Input
textimagevideo
Output
text

GLM-4.7-Flash Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

See all model comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Qwen3.5 9B has cheaper input pricing at $0.04/M tokens. Qwen3.5 9B has cheaper output pricing at $0.15/M tokens.
Qwen3.5 9B scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 21.4, compared to GLM-4.7-Flash's score of 11.0.
Qwen3.5 9B has a 262,144 token context window, while GLM-4.7-Flash has a 202,752 token context window.
Qwen3.5 9B does not support vision. GLM-4.7-Flash supports vision.

Built by @aellman

Archive
Follow us:
Advertise | Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026 68 Ventures, LLC. All rights reserved.